TUMBLR USER - “You know, you can just rotate a cow in your mind if you want. It’s free and the cops can’t stop you.”
AUTHORITY - What did he say? You can’t stop him? Oh, he’s got another think coming.
CONCEPTUALIZATION - What an intriguing idea, though! Maybe you should let him get away with it…
“As an officer of the law, I demand that you cease rotating the cow.”
“Whoa, cool! I want to try.”
THOUGHT GAINED: Rotating Cow
(if pursued the rotating cow thought adds an animated rotating cow to the corner of your screen. the cow does nothing and cannot be dismissed, since the cops can’t stop you.)
do you not remember the free the nipple protests at all it is literally saying exactly that. like that was their whole thing. you shouldn’t need ~consent~ from onlookers to exist with a body in a public space.
Literally the main concern of the free the nipple movement is that women being topless is considered “non-consentually flashing people” while it’s just normal for men to do it
It shouldn’t have to be said, but if you’re bashing on women actually being topless then you’re actively working AGAINST the movement
in this terrifying world you continuously have the power to offer someone else a little relief . why would you withhold that. do you remember what a little relief feels like? it feels like a lot
excuse me? are you suggesting i frolic directly into someone’s emotional space and assume what brings them relief, potentially causing more stress? are you encouraging people to reach past their own boundaries to help, increasing net suffering if it costs more than the other gains? surely not; that would be advocating for emotional self-harm.
this is a post about the woman who waived my late fee at the bank .
good for you, good for her, the wording on the initial post feels closer to blaming people who don’t reach out than celebrating those who do by a large enough margin that i feel the need to hit back
you are a tar pit
I know I’ve reblogged this already today but I like. this point
